Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Marie C. Schantz, Respondent, v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Appellant
Schantz v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 178 A. 768 (N.J. 1935)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for ■ the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
*175 For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Bodihe, Heher, Perskie, Yah Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 9.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.