TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

West Jersey Trust Co. v. Hayday

West Jersey Trust Company (Now Camden Trust Company), Trustee, &C., Et Al., Respondents, v. Horace R. Hayday Et Al., Appellants

West Jersey Trust Co. v. Hayday, 4 A.2d 280 (N.J. 1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 6, 1939
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
4 A.2d 280125 N.J. Eq. 901939 N.J. LEXIS 629

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Sooy, and reported in 124 N. J. Eq. 85.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Eaeeerty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11953: 11965: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. President of the Manhattan Co. v. Armour94 A.2d 286 (N.J. 1953)
  2. Wagner v. Cook206 A.2d 865 (N.J. 1965)
  3. Rausch v. Libby29 A.2d 378 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Wagner v. Cook206 A.2d 865 (N.J. 1965)
  2. President of the Manhattan Co. v. Armour94 A.2d 286 (N.J. 1953)
  3. Rausch v. Libby29 A.2d 378 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list