TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Benjamin v. Kurnick

Edward Benjamin, Respondent, v. Max Kurnick, Appellant

Benjamin v. Kurnick, 141 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 14, 1928
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
141 A. 919104 N.J.L. 6481928 N.J. LEXIS 276

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Paekee, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — -None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list