Fidelity Building & Loan Ass'n v. Elizabeth Avenue Holding Co.
Fidelity Building and Loan Association of Linden, New Jersey, Complainant-Respondent, v. Elizabeth Avenue Holding Company, Defendant-Respondent; F. R. Cruikshank & Company, Defendant-Appellant, and Joseph Hilton & Sons, Incorporated, Et Al., Defendants
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
Our examination of the proofs leads us to the conclusion that the facts developed bring the case within the principal established by this court in cases of similar character, notably, Russ Distributing Corp.
v. Lichtman, 111 N. J. Law 21; Domestic Electric Co.
v. Mezzaluna, 109 N. J. Law 574, and Lumpkin v. Holland Furnace Co., 118 N. J. Eq. 813.
The decree is affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.
For reversal —None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.