TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Calef

In the Matter of the Probate of the Alleged Lost Will of Eliza A.S. Calef

In re Calef, 162 A. 579 (N.J. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 17, 1932
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
162 A. 579111 N.J. Eq. 3551932 N.J. LEXIS 730
Cited by 3

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Berry, and reported in 109 N.J. Eq. 181 . For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 356

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →
1940: 11942: 11946: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ehling v. Diebert15 A.2d 655 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1940)
  2. Page v. Parks6 N.W.2d 298 (Iowa 1942)
  3. O'Neill's Estate58 Pa. D. & C. 351 (1946)

Most recent

  1. O'Neill's Estate58 Pa. D. & C. 351 (1946)
  2. Page v. Parks6 N.W.2d 298 (Iowa 1942)
  3. Ehling v. Diebert15 A.2d 655 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1940)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Calef, 156 A. 475 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1931) 24

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list