TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Nauman v. Central Lafayette Realty Company, Inc.

Wilbur Nauman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Central & Lafayette Realty Company, Inc., Defendant-Respondent

Nauman v. Cent. Lafayette Realty Co., 62 A.2d 218 (N.J. 1948)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 29, 1948
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
62 A.2d 2181 N.J. 1241948 N.J. LEXIS 397

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Burling in the court below.

For affirmance:

Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Oliphant, Waoiieneeld and Ackerson—4.

For reversal:

Justice ITeher—1.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2010: 120102026peak 2010 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)

Most recent

  1. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services9 A.3d 882 (N.J. 2010)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list