Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Company
Anthime Downing, Respondent, v. Oxweld Acetylene Company, Appellant
Downing v. Oxweld Acetylene Co., 174 A. 507 (N.J. 1934)
Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Peeskie, Yan Buskibk, Kays, Deae, JJ. 9.
For reversal — Case, Heteield, Wells, JJ. 3.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.