TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kluger v. Mendelsohn

Harry Kluger, Respondent, v. Jacob Mendelsohn Et Al., Appellants

Kluger v. Mendelsohn, 169 A. 691 (N.J. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1934
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
169 A. 691112 N.J.L. 961934 N.J. LEXIS 234

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list