TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Katz v. Essex Sales Co.

William Katz, Appellant, v. Essex Sales Company, Respondent

Katz v. Essex Sales Co., 138 A. 921 (N.J. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 17, 1927
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
138 A. 921104 N.J.L. 1741927 N.J. LEXIS 311

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*175 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Paricer, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list