TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Henry Steers, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.

Henry Steers, Incorporated, a Corporation, Respondent, v. Turner Construction Company, a Corporation, Appellant

Henry Steers, Inc. v. Turner Constr. Co., 139 A. 42 (N.J. 1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 17, 1927
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
139 A. 42104 N.J.L. 1891927 N.J. LEXIS 331

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Bus-kirk, McGlehnon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 11939: 11941: 11945: 11952: 11955: 219382026peak 1955 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Elam278 S.W.2d 693 (Tenn. 1955)
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Elam278 S.W.2d 693 (Tenn. 1955)
  3. State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Pressley250 P.2d 992 (Ariz. 1952)
  4. Gelbart v. N. J. Federated Egg Producers Ass'n7 A.2d 636 (1939)
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Union Ry. Co.187 S.W.2d 615 (Tenn. 1945)
  6. States v. Bettis39 F. Supp. 160 (S.D. Cal. 1941)

Most recent

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Elam278 S.W.2d 693 (Tenn. 1955)
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Elam278 S.W.2d 693 (Tenn. 1955)
  3. State ex rel. Industrial Commission v. Pressley250 P.2d 992 (Ariz. 1952)
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Union Ry. Co.187 S.W.2d 615 (Tenn. 1945)
  5. States v. Bettis39 F. Supp. 160 (S.D. Cal. 1941)
  6. Gelbart v. N. J. Federated Egg Producers Ass'n7 A.2d 636 (1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list