TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Union County Savings Bank v. Kolpenitsky

Union County Savings Bank, a Corporation of New Jersey, Complainant-Respondent v. Jacob Kolpenitsky and Lena Kolpenitsky, His Wife, Defendants Franklin Stores Co.

Union Cnty. Sav. Bank v. Kolpenitsky, 4 A.2d 413 (N.J. 1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 6, 1939
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
4 A.2d 413125 N.J. Eq. 1251939 N.J. LEXIS 637

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Stein.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 129

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1942: 11949: 119422026peak 1942 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Toth v. Vazquez65 A.2d 778 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
  2. In re Kuser26 A.2d 688 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Toth v. Vazquez65 A.2d 778 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
  2. In re Kuser26 A.2d 688 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list