TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Woodstown National Bank & Trust Co. v. Snelbaker

Woodstown National Bank and Trust Co. Et Al., Executors, &C., Respondents, v. William B. Snelbaker Et Al., Appellants

Woodstown Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Snelbaker, 44 A.2d 210 (N.J. 1945)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 27, 1945
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
44 A.2d 210137 N.J. Eq. 2561945 N.J. LEXIS 431
Cited by 6

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by "Vice-Chancellor Sooy, and reported at 136 N. J. Eq. 62.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1948: 11949: 11950: 11951: 11952: 11962: 119482026peak 1948 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Robbins v. Lee Mishkin371 P.2d 573 (Cal. 1962)
  2. Litcher v. Trust Co. of New Jersey93 A.2d 368 (N.J. 1952)
  3. Mirinda v. King78 A.2d 98 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  4. Wilber v. Asbury Park National Bank, C., Co.59 A.2d 570 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1948)
  5. Wendell v. Hazel Wood Cemetery67 A.2d 219 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
  6. Wendell v. Hazel Wood Cemetery72 A.2d 383 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)

Most recent

  1. Robbins v. Lee Mishkin371 P.2d 573 (Cal. 1962)
  2. Litcher v. Trust Co. of New Jersey93 A.2d 368 (N.J. 1952)
  3. Mirinda v. King78 A.2d 98 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  4. Wendell v. Hazel Wood Cemetery72 A.2d 383 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  5. Wendell v. Hazel Wood Cemetery67 A.2d 219 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
  6. Wilber v. Asbury Park National Bank, C., Co.59 A.2d 570 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1948)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list