TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Lisena

State of New Jersey, Defendant in Error, v. Michael A. Lisena, Plaintiff in Error

State v. Lisena, 34 A.2d 407 (N.J. 1943)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 4, 1943
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
34 A.2d 407131 N.J.L. 391943 N.J. LEXIS 296

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Persiqe, Dear, Wells, JJ. 6.

For reversal — Case, Heher, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 5.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1965: 119652026peak 1965 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Kurowski210 A.2d 873 (R.I. 1965)

Most recent

  1. State v. Kurowski210 A.2d 873 (R.I. 1965)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list