TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dobbelaar v. Hughes

Lawrence Dobbelaar, Complainant-Appellant, v. John Edward Hughes Et Al., Defendants-Respondents

Dobbelaar v. Hughes, 156 A. 469 (N.J. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 19, 1931
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
156 A. 469109 N.J. Eq. 2001931 N.J. LEXIS 563

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons^ given in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hbtfield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 11952: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Allen92 A.2d 857 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  2. Huber v. Liptak42 A.2d 705 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)

Most recent

  1. In re Allen92 A.2d 857 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  2. Huber v. Liptak42 A.2d 705 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list