TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Healey v. Walbrook Park Co.

Margaret Healey Et Al., Appellants, v. Walbrook Park Company Et Al., Respondents

Healey v. Walbrook Park Co., 184 A. 518 (N.J. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 24, 1936
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
184 A. 518120 N.J. Eq. 1991936 N.J. LEXIS 686

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan, and reported in 118 N. J. Eq. 80.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 11973: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bradley v. LaPenna490 S.W.2d 500 (Tenn. 1973)
  2. Regan v. Cozy Lake, Inc.44 A.2d 364 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)

Most recent

  1. Bradley v. LaPenna490 S.W.2d 500 (Tenn. 1973)
  2. Regan v. Cozy Lake, Inc.44 A.2d 364 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list