TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co.

Frank Cavanaugh, Respondent, v. Murphy Varnish Company, Appellant

Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co., 35 A.2d 896 (N.J. 1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 27, 1944
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
35 A.2d 896131 N.J.L. 1631944 N.J. LEXIS 164
Cited by 6

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Tub Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Bobine, Heher, Porter, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, "Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1949: 11950: 11951: 21952: 11957: 119492026peak 1951 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Grassgreen v. Ridgeley Sportswear Mfg. Co.64 A.2d 616 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
  2. Mills v. Monte Christi Corp.76 A.2d 839 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  3. Neylon v. Ford Motor Company86 A.2d 577 (N.J. 1952)
  4. Ptak v. General Electric Co.85 A.2d 214 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  5. Neylon v. Ford Motor Co.80 A.2d 235 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  6. Gibson v. Todd Shipyard Corp.132 A.2d 337 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)

Most recent

  1. Gibson v. Todd Shipyard Corp.132 A.2d 337 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  2. Neylon v. Ford Motor Company86 A.2d 577 (N.J. 1952)
  3. Ptak v. General Electric Co.85 A.2d 214 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  4. Neylon v. Ford Motor Co.80 A.2d 235 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  5. Mills v. Monte Christi Corp.76 A.2d 839 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  6. Grassgreen v. Ridgeley Sportswear Mfg. Co.64 A.2d 616 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list