TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Colonial Discount Co. v. Bures

Colonial Discount Company, Incorporated, Respondent, v. Rudolph Bures, Appellant

Colonial Disc. Co. v. Bures, 154 A. 631 (N.J. 1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 2, 1931
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
154 A. 631107 N.J.L. 3741931 N.J. LEXIS 169

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*375 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirm,anee — Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Boline, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Kone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 11960: 219572026peak 1960 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Budget Corp. of America v. DeFelice135 A.2d 31 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  2. NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. Dorsey158 A.2d 712 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1960)
  3. NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. Dorsey165 A.2d 297 (N.J. 1960)

Most recent

  1. NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. Dorsey165 A.2d 297 (N.J. 1960)
  2. NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. Dorsey158 A.2d 712 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1960)
  3. Budget Corp. of America v. DeFelice135 A.2d 31 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list