TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Downs v. Mayor, C., South Amboy

THOMAS E. DOWNS, Jr., JOHN R. SEGRAVE, ANDREW KRONEMEYER AND MARY J. BROWN, PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH AMBOY AND THE CITY OF SOUTH AMBOY, RESPONDENTS

Downs v. Mayor, C., South Amboy, 185 A. 15 (N.J. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 14, 1936
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
185 A. 15116 N.J.L. 5111936 N.J. LEXIS 302

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*517 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Bodine, Donges, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, JJ. 6.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Heher, Perskie, Raffert, JJ. 4.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 11956: 11963: 11967: 11982: 21989: 12002: 119522026peak 1982 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Allen v. Board of Educ.559 A.2d 883 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
  2. Pyatt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Dunellen89 A.2d 1 (N.J. 1952)
  3. Rivers v. Cox-Rivers788 A.2d 320 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2002)
  4. Hochberg v. Borough of Freehold123 A.2d 46 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)
  5. Cranberry Lake Quarry Co. v. Johnson231 A.2d 837 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1967)
  6. Palisades Properties, Inc. v. Brady191 A.2d 501 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)

Most recent

  1. Rivers v. Cox-Rivers788 A.2d 320 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2002)
  2. Allen v. Board of Educ.559 A.2d 883 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionNo. MW-477 (Tex. Att'y Gen. July 2, 1982)
  4. Opinion No.(Tex. Att'y Gen. June 10, 1982)
  5. Cranberry Lake Quarry Co. v. Johnson231 A.2d 837 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1967)
  6. Palisades Properties, Inc. v. Brady191 A.2d 501 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list