TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Grant Lunch Corp. v. Driscoll

Grant Lunch Corporation, Appellant, v. Alfred E. Driscoll, Commissioner, Etc., Respondent

Grant Lunch Corp. v. Driscoll, 33 A.2d 900 (N.J. 1943)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 16, 1943
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
33 A.2d 900130 N.J.L. 5541943 N.J. LEXIS 277
Cited by 11

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 11 cases

View all citing references →
1943: 11950: 11951: 11952: 11953: 11954: 21955: 21963: 11975: 119432026peak 1954 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mazza v. Cavicchia105 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1954)
  2. Fenwick v. Kay American Jeep, Inc.344 A.2d 785 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
  3. Cino v. Driscoll34 A.2d 6 (N.J. 1943)
  4. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Larsen86 A.2d 430 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  5. Cooley's, Etc., Found. v. Legalized Games, Etc.187 A.2d 731 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)
  6. Roca Bacó v. Thomson77 P.R. Dec. 419 (1954)

Most recent

  1. Fenwick v. Kay American Jeep, Inc.344 A.2d 785 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
  2. Cooley's, Etc., Found. v. Legalized Games, Etc.187 A.2d 731 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)
  3. Butler Oak Tavern v. DIV. OF ALCO. BEV. CONTROL116 A.2d 594 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
  4. Benedetti v. Bd. of Com'rs of Trenton113 A.2d 44 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
  5. Roca Bacó v. Thomson77 P.R. Dec. 419 (1954)
  6. Mazza v. Cavicchia105 A.2d 545 (N.J. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list