TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Cecil James Rhodes and John Simmons

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cecil James RHODES and John Simmons, A/K/A “Buckeye”, Defendants-Appellants

United States v. Rhodes, 579 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 1, 1978
Docket
No. 78-1568
Judges
Morgan, Clark, Tjo-Flat
Citations
579 F.2d 3661978 U.S. App. LEXIS 9261

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The appellants tendered pleas of guilty to two counts of a four-count indictment. Simmons was given consecutive sentences totalling eight years’ incarceration and Rhodes was given consecutive sentences to-talling seven years. Eight days later, February 14, 1978, both appellants moved to withdraw their guilty pleas on the ground that the government violated the plea bargain agreement. The district court denied this motion the next day, February 15. The appellants did not file a notice of appeal from that denial until March 9, 1978.

Appellants’ motion to withdraw their guilty pleas was a part of the original criminal case, not an independent civil action. Their appeal from the district court’s denial of this motion was thus untimely under Fed.R.App.P. 4(b), which requires a defendant appealing in a criminal case to file a notice of appeal within 10 days after the entry of the judgment or order appealed from. We remand the case to allow the district court to determine whether excusable neglect entitles appellants to an extension of the time for appeal.

See United States v. Guiterrez, 556 F.2d 1217 (5th Cir. 1977).

REMANDED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1983: 119832026peak 1983 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Sammy Lee Ward, Edward B. Prows696 F.2d 1315 (11th Cir. 1983)

Most recent

  1. United States v. Sammy Lee Ward, Edward B. Prows696 F.2d 1315 (11th Cir. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Jose Luis Herrera Guiterrez & Jose Herrera Nieto, 556 F.2d 1217 (5th Cir. 1977) 30

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list