Goldfarb v. Reicher
Benjamin Goldfarb, Appellant, v. Harry J. Reicher Et Al., Respondents
Goldfarb v. Reicher, 174 A. 900 (N.J. 1934)
Opinion of the Court
*400 Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tkenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.