TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Humphreys v. Ibach

George W. Humphreys Et Al., Appellants, v. Emil Ibach Et Al., Respondents

Humphreys v. Ibach, 160 A. 531 (N.J. 1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 16, 1932
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
160 A. 531110 N.J. Eq. 6471932 N.J. LEXIS 82885 A.L.R. 980
Cited by 24 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

For affirmance — The Chief1-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 24 cases

View all citing references →
1934: 11940: 21941: 21945: 11948: 41949: 21951: 11952: 11956: 21962: 21971: 11974: 11984: 11986: 12013: 12021: 119342026peak 1948 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Grange v. Korff79 N.W.2d 743 (Iowa 1956)
  2. Weinstein v. Swartz68 A.2d 865 (N.J. 1949)
  3. Commonwealth v. Butler985 N.E.2d 377 (Mass. 2013)
  4. McComb v. Hanly16 A.2d 74 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1940)
  5. Wallace v. St. Clair127 S.E.2d 742 (W. Va. 1962)
  6. Collum v. Neuhoff507 S.W.2d 920 (Tex. App. 1974)

Most recent

  1. KATHLEEN CHERRY VS. ZIAD HADAYA (C-000042-17, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)No. A-0384-19 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Oct. 29, 2021)
  2. Commonwealth v. Butler985 N.E.2d 377 (Mass. 2013)
  3. Blaine v. Ritger512 A.2d 553 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)
  4. El Di, Inc. v. Town of Bethany Beach477 A.2d 1066 (Del. 1984)
  5. Collum v. Neuhoff507 S.W.2d 920 (Tex. App. 1974)
  6. Petersen v. Beekmere, Incorporated283 A.2d 911 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list