TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Burack v. Mayers

Harry Burack, Complainant-Appellant, v. Pauline Mayers, Executrix of the Estate of Edward Mayers, Deceased, Defendant-Respondent

Burack v. Mayers, 191 A. 841 (N.J. 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 30, 1937
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
191 A. 841122 N.J. Eq. 51937 N.J. LEXIS 567

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing the bill of complaint. We have examined with care the record and conclude that it entirely justified the decree made and the decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Persicie. Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Cole, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1937: 11938: 11942: 11944: 21945: 11957: 11961: 119372026peak 1944 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gilbert v. Pennington Trap Rock Co.39 A.2d 647 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1944)
  2. Reinfeld v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.198 A. 220 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1938)
  3. Kruger v. Mark37 A.2d 100 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1944)
  4. Massey v. Del-Valley Corp.134 A.2d 802 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  5. Eichler v. Hillside National Bank176 A.2d 508 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
  6. Adelman v. Franklin Washington Trust Co.44 A.2d 399 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)

Most recent

  1. Eichler v. Hillside National Bank176 A.2d 508 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
  2. Massey v. Del-Valley Corp.134 A.2d 802 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  3. Adelman v. Franklin Washington Trust Co.44 A.2d 399 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)
  4. Gilbert v. Pennington Trap Rock Co.39 A.2d 647 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1944)
  5. Kruger v. Mark37 A.2d 100 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1944)
  6. Bell v. Merchants B. L. Assn.28 A.2d 295 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1942)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list