Spalinski v. Suto
Hugo A. Spalinski, Appellant, v. Stephen J. Suto, Respondent
Spalinski v. Suto, 31 A.2d 819 (N.J. 1943)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Donges, Porter, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Thompson, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.