TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Chelsea Hotel Corp. v. Gelles

Chelsea Hotel Corp., Respondent, v. Nathan Gelles, Appellant

Chelsea Hotel Corp. v. Gelles, 28 A.2d 172 (N.J. 1942)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 18, 1942
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
28 A.2d 172129 N.J.L. 1021942 N.J. LEXIS 296

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*106 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jayne.

For affirmance —The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 15.

For reversal —None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1947: 11948: 11978: 119472026peak 1947 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ryan v. Huffman199 P.2d 407 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)
  2. Barker v. Utah Oil Refining Co.178 P.2d 386 (Utah 1947) · Dissent
  3. Greenaway v. Johnson15 V.I. 195 (1978)

Most recent

  1. Greenaway v. Johnson15 V.I. 195 (1978)
  2. Ryan v. Huffman199 P.2d 407 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)
  3. Barker v. Utah Oil Refining Co.178 P.2d 386 (Utah 1947) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list