State v. Rowe
State of New Jersey, Defendant in Error, v. Harold Rowe, Plaintiff in Error
State v. Rowe, 5 A.2d 697 (N.J. 1939)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Perskie in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Hague, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.