Kinsey v. Butz
John S. Kinsey, Respondent, v. Solomon Butz Et Al., Appellants
Kinsey v. Butz, 134 A. 918 (N.J. 1926)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Kalisch, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.