TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Tobin

In the Matter of the Probate of the Alleged Will of Amelia Craig Tobin, Deceased

In re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Tobin, 168 A. 464 (N.J. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 27, 1933
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
168 A. 464114 N.J. Eq. 1701933 N.J. LEXIS 894

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*171 Per Curiam.

The executors of the will of Amelia Graig Tobin appeal from a decree of the prerogative court awarding a fee of $5,000 to counsel for the contestants. This was a reduction of $2,500 from the award in the orphans court. The sole question before us is the reasonableness of the contest. The two grounds of contest were undue influence and incapacity. The testatrix had independent advice. There is not a suggestion in the record that the beneficiaries exerted the slightest influence over any of her acts. In fact, the contestants5 proofs demonstrate nothing except that there were frequent quarrels and bickerings between testatrix and the principal objects of her bounty. Everything proved indicated that testatrix disposed of her estate, as she had long planned, to the objects of her affections.

As to mental incapacity, the evidence indicates more than usual mental alertness. Since there was no reasonable basis for the contest, there was no basis for the allowance.

The decree will be reversed.

For r, Heher, Perskie, JJ. 3.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 11.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1935: 11942: 11946: 119352026peak 1935 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. McTamney v. McTamney46 A.2d 444 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1946)
  2. In re Raynolds27 A.2d 226 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1942)
  3. In re Tenenbaum179 A. 273 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1935)

Most recent

  1. McTamney v. McTamney46 A.2d 444 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1946)
  2. In re Raynolds27 A.2d 226 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1942)
  3. In re Tenenbaum179 A. 273 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1935)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list