TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

City of Newark v. Parker

The City of Newark, Prosecutor, v. Charles W. Parker, Justice of the Supreme Court, Et Al., Defendants

City of Newark v. Parker, 195 A. 296 (N.J. 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 18, 1937
Judges
Parker
Citations
195 A. 296119 N.J.L. 22534 Gummere 2251937 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 211

Opinion of the Court — Parker

Parker, J.

In the matter of the summary investigation into the affairs of the city of Newark, which lasted a year and was concluded about a month ago, application was made to me to tax the costs incurred under the statute, on notice to the city and proper officers thereof, who were represented by counsel at the hearing; whereupon, order was made on October 26th last, fixing certain amounts to he paid, and reserving certain items of expenses claimed to have been paid, for further adjudication. A memorandum of my conclusions had previously been filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court.

The city desires to review this order by certiorari, and applies to me as the Supreme Court justice assigned to Essex county for a writ to review my order of October 26th. Some doubt is intimated as to whether the justice who by the statute is specially endowed with jurisdiction to order and supervise the investigation upon the application of twentv-fivo free *226 holders, is qualified to pass on applications for certiorari of his own orders in the matter. But my present view is that he is so qualified.

Certiorari seems to be accredited as the remedy.

Park Ridge v. Reynolds, 73

N. J. L.

116; 74 Id.

449;

Hoboken v. O’Neill, 74

Id.

57;

In re North Bergen, 91

Id.

19;

North Bergen v. Gough, 107 Id.

424;

In re Newark, 118 Id.

533. In this last case I heard and refused an application for certiorari of an order in this very proceeding, and further application was made to the court in banc.

Taking up the merits of the present application: the propriety of the awards made was fully argued before me on October 23d last, and decided October 26th, by an order based on the memorandum above mentioned, on file as already noted. No new considerations are presented on this present application. The awards made herein seem quite in line with those made in the North Bergen matter, supra, and in a New Brunswick investigation in 1934, in each of which cases a copy of the order is before me.

Allocatur of a certiorari is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list