Diffley v. Jacobson Manufacturing Co.

P. Gerome Diffley, Respondent, v. Jacobson Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, Appellant

Diffley v. Jacobson Mfg. Co., 147 A. 908 (N.J. 1929)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided: October 14, 1929
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Citations: 147 A. 908105 N.J.L. 6311929 N.J. LEXIS 282

Cited by 3

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Campbell, Case, Bodine, White, Yan Bus-kirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Adams v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.114 A.2d 776 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
Roselle v. La Fera Contracting Co.86 A.2d 449 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
Earl B. Wright v. Disabled American Veterans, a Corporation271 F.2d 827 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Most recent

Earl B. Wright v. Disabled American Veterans, a Corporation271 F.2d 827 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
Adams v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.114 A.2d 776 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
Roselle v. La Fera Contracting Co.86 A.2d 449 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list