TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Romaine

In the Matter of the Petition to Vacate the Probate of the Will of Anna E. Romaine

In re Romaine, 170 A. 16 (N.J. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1934
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
170 A. 16115 N.J. Eq. 172

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

The orders appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fallon, and reported in 113 N.J. Eq. 477 . For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None. *Page 173

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1938: 119382026peak 1938 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Smalley2 A.2d 321 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1938)

Most recent

  1. In re Smalley2 A.2d 321 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1938)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Romaine, 167 A. 683 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1933) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list