TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dana College v. State Board of Tax Appeals

Dana College, Prosecutor-Appellant v. State Board of Tax Appeals and City of Newark, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent.

College v. State Bd. of Tax Appeals, 189 A. 620 (N.J. 1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 28, 1937
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
189 A. 620117 N.J.L. 5301937 N.J. LEXIS 218

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The question at issue here is the right of appellant to an exemption from taxes. A review and discussion of the factual situation, considered upon certiorari to the Supreme Court, is contained in the opinion of that court. The writ of certiorari brought to the Supreme Court the judgment of the state board of tax appeals affirming the Essex county hoard of taxation in its denial of the exemption claimed. The Supreme Court held that the question was one of fact; declined to reverse the action of the state board of tax appeals and dismissed the writ. With this we are in accord.

We have carefully studied the testimony, the arguments advanced by appellant and the authorities relied upon by appellant, but, viewed in the aspect most favorable tb appellant, the evidence adduced below tended to support the conclusion that, as of the date of the assessment, Dana College was conducted as a commercial enterprise and the findings below, based upon conflicting evidence, cannot be disturbed here.

We are not to be understood as adopting the view expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court that incidents in proof which occurred after the assessment date tended to establish *531 that appellant is now in the exempt class. This conclusion is entirely outside the scope of the issue here presented.

With this modification, the action of the Supreme Court in dismissing the writ of certiorari is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 11942: 11949: 21954: 11958: 11961: 11993: 119412026peak 1949 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pine Grove Manor v. Director, Div. of Taxation171 A.2d 676 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
  2. General Electric Co. v. City of Passaic147 A.2d 233 (N.J. 1958)
  3. Borough of Edgewater v. Connoil Corp.67 A.2d 196 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
  4. City of Ventnor City v. Interdenominational Foreign Missionary Society of New Jersey, Inc.13 N.J. Tax 445 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1993)
  5. The Kimberley School v. Town of Montclair65 A.2d 500 (N.J. 1949)
  6. City of Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals21 A.2d 644 (N.J. 1941)

Most recent

  1. City of Ventnor City v. Interdenominational Foreign Missionary Society of New Jersey, Inc.13 N.J. Tax 445 (N.J. Tax Ct. 1993)
  2. Pine Grove Manor v. Director, Div. of Taxation171 A.2d 676 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
  3. General Electric Co. v. City of Passaic147 A.2d 233 (N.J. 1958)
  4. Rafferzeder ex rel. Rafferzeder v. Raleigh Fitkin, Memorial Hospital103 A.2d 383 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  5. Borough of Edgewater v. Connoil Corp.67 A.2d 196 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
  6. The Kimberley School v. Town of Montclair65 A.2d 500 (N.J. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list