TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ratajczak v. Board of Educ. of City of Perth Amboy

Edward Ratajczak, Respondent, v. the Board of Education of the City of Perth Amboy, New Jersey, Appellant

Ratajczak v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Perth Amboy, 182 A. 897 (N.J. 1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 31, 1936
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
182 A. 897116 N.J.L. 1621936 N.J. LEXIS 213

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hetfteld, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — -None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1937: 11941: 119372026peak 1937 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Drew v. Missouri Pacific Railroad100 S.W.2d 516 (Mo. 1937)
  2. Fury v. New York & Long Branch Railroad22 A.2d 286 (N.J. 1941)

Most recent

  1. Fury v. New York & Long Branch Railroad22 A.2d 286 (N.J. 1941)
  2. Drew v. Missouri Pacific Railroad100 S.W.2d 516 (Mo. 1937)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list