DeBello v. Reep & Blackford, Inc.
ANTHONY DeBELLO, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, JACK DeBELLO, RESPONDENT, V, REEP & BLACKFORD, INC., APPELLANT
DeBello v. Reep & Blackford, Inc., 127 A. 522 (N.J. 1925)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, Clark, MoGlennon, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Kone.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(granting compensation where employee, driving a company vehicle, deviated from an errand to pick up a friend)
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.