TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sefton v. Board of Conservation & Development

Frederick Sefton, Appellant, v. Board of Conservation and Development Et Al., Respondents

Sefton v. Bd. of Conservation & Dev., 132 A. 923 (N.J. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 1, 1926
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
132 A. 923102 N.J.L. 4661926 N.J. LEXIS 197

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*467 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list