TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pine v. Gardner

Samuel H. Pine, Appellant, v. Cordelia Mary Gardner, Respondent

Pine v. Gardner, 142 A. 50 (N.J. 1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 14, 1928
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
142 A. 50103 N.J. Eq. 691928 N.J. LEXIS 636

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — Hone.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1937: 11940: 11945: 11950: 119372026peak 1937 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Lang v. Hexter43 A.2d 690 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)
  2. Cocheu v. N.J. General Security Co.15 A.2d 124 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1940)
  3. Fowler v. Scott73 A.2d 278 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  4. Island Holding Co. v. Leeds193 A. 689 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1937)

Most recent

  1. Fowler v. Scott73 A.2d 278 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  2. Lang v. Hexter43 A.2d 690 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)
  3. Cocheu v. N.J. General Security Co.15 A.2d 124 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1940)
  4. Island Holding Co. v. Leeds193 A. 689 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1937)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list