Erion v. Board of Pension Commrs., Hoboken
Katherine Erion, Appellant, v. Board of Pension Commissioners of Hoboken Et Al., Respondents
Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Ackerson in the Supreme Court, to whom the matter was submitted by consent, which is printed in 11 N. J. Mis. R.
122.
■For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.