Appley v. Township Committee of Bernards

Joseph E. Appley, Prosecutor-Respondent, v. Township Committee of the Township of Bernards, Defendant-Appellant

Appley v. Twp. Comm. of Bernards, 28 A.2d 177 (N.J. 1942)

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided: September 18, 1942
Judges: PER CURIAM.
Citations: 28 A.2d 177129 N.J.L. 731942 N.J. LEXIS 277

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*74 Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the careful and comprehensive opinion of Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court, ubi supra.

However, one irregularity in practice should not pass unnoticed. The case is submitted on briefs, and the brief for the appellant bears the signatures of two members of the bar as “of counsel” though one of them is not a counselor-at-law. If his signature had been the only one, the brief would have been rejected, pursuant to well settled rules.

Duysters v. Crawford, 69

N. J. L.

229;

Leaver v. Kilmer, 54

Atl. Rep.

817 ; reversed on other grounds, 71 N. J. L.

291;

Moore v. Bradley Beach, 87

Id.

391, 395;

Gadek v. Kugler, 6

N. J. Mis. R.

471; 141 Atl. Rep.

561 ;

Hirsch v. DePuy, 11 N. J. Mis. R.

500; 166 Atl. Rep.

720 . It has been considered, however, as the brief of the other signer, who is a counselor-at-law.

For affirmance —The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal —None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Tucker v. State Bar177 P.2d 557 (Cal. 1947)
VF Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF SUMMIT86 A.2d 127 (N.J. 1952)
Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons85 A.2d 279 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
Conlon v. BD. OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PATERSON94 A.2d 660 (N.J. 1953)
S & L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Washington Twp.160 A.2d 635 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1960)
Jones v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, Long Beach Tp.108 A.2d 498 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)

Most recent

S & L ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Washington Twp.160 A.2d 635 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1960)
Bogert v. Washington Twp.131 A.2d 535 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
AL Walker, Inc. v. Borough of Stanhope130 A.2d 372 (N.J. 1957)
Sieber v. Laawe109 A.2d 470 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
Jones v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, Long Beach Tp.108 A.2d 498 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
Conlon v. BD. OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF PATERSON94 A.2d 660 (N.J. 1953)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

Depth	Case	Cited by
	Hirsch v. DePuy, 166 A. 720 (N.J. 1933)	3
	Gadek v. Kugler, 141 A. 561 (N.J. 1928)	2

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list