Richardson v. Heinochowitz
Howard Richardson, Respondent, v. Jacob Heinochowitz, Appellant
Richardson v. Heinochowitz, 128 A. 152 (N.J. 1925)
Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.