Buchman v. Smith
Lydia R. Buchman and Mae K. Tempel, Complainantsrespondents, v. Emmett v. B. Smith, Individually, Defendant-Appellant
Buchman v. Smith, 54 A.2d 775 (N.J. 1947)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, filed in the Court of Chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, IIei-ier, Colie, Waci-ieneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells,. Dill, Freund, McG-eeiian, McLean, JJ. 13. .
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.