TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Buchman v. Smith

Lydia R. Buchman and Mae K. Tempel, Complainantsrespondents, v. Emmett v. B. Smith, Individually, Defendant-Appellant

Buchman v. Smith, 54 A.2d 775 (N.J. 1947)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 12, 1947
Judges
Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Iiei-Ier, Colie, Waci-Ieneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McG-eeiian, McLean, None
Citations
54 A.2d 775140 N.J. Eq. 390

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, filed in the Court of Chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Donges, IIei-ier, Colie, Waci-ieneeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells,. Dill, Freund, McG-eeiian, McLean, JJ. 13. .

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 11954: 119522026peak 1952 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, MONMOUTH91 A.2d 580 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  2. Foster v. Reiss107 A.2d 24 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)

Most recent

  1. Foster v. Reiss107 A.2d 24 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
  2. Johnson v. BD. OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, MONMOUTH91 A.2d 580 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list