TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McConnell v. Beach Realty Co.

DAVID T. McCONNELL, RESPONDENT, v. BEACH REALTY CO., APPELLANT

McConnell v. Beach Realty Co., 36 A.2d 604 (N.J. 1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 23, 1944
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
36 A.2d 604131 N.J.L. 3251944 N.J. LEXIS 197
Cited by 3

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodinb, Donges, IIeher, Pbrskie, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson. Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 3 cases

View all citing references →
1951: 11956: 12000: 119512026peak 1951 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Heyman v. Linwood Park125 A.2d 345 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)
  2. Pable v. Zebrowski83 A.2d 352 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)
  3. Vuarnet Footwear, Inc. v. Sea-Rail Services Corp.759 A.2d 1230 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)

Most recent

  1. Vuarnet Footwear, Inc. v. Sea-Rail Services Corp.759 A.2d 1230 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)
  2. Heyman v. Linwood Park125 A.2d 345 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)
  3. Pable v. Zebrowski83 A.2d 352 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list