TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Simpson v. Hudson County National Bank

Alexander Simpson, Appellant, v. Hudson County National Bank, Respondent

Simpson v. Hudson Cnty. Nat'l Bank, 57 A.2d 473 (N.J. 1948)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 29, 1948
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
57 A.2d 473141 N.J. Eq. 3531948 N.J. LEXIS 630
Cited by 6

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodife, Dofges, Heher, Colie, Waohenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Feeufd, McLean, Schettifo, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1949: 11950: 11955: 11976: 11989: 11994: 119492026peak 1949 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.90 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. Pa. 1950)
  2. First National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority870 S.W.2d 400 (Ark. Ct. App. 1994)
  3. New Jersey Bank v. Toffler353 A.2d 116 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
  4. Ribeira & Lourenco v. Jackson Health554 A.2d 1350 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
  5. Munter v. Lankford127 F. Supp. 630 (D.D.C. 1955)
  6. Hudson County National Bank v. Simpson68 A.2d 542 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)

Most recent

  1. First National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority870 S.W.2d 400 (Ark. Ct. App. 1994)
  2. Ribeira & Lourenco v. Jackson Health554 A.2d 1350 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
  3. New Jersey Bank v. Toffler353 A.2d 116 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
  4. Munter v. Lankford127 F. Supp. 630 (D.D.C. 1955)
  5. Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.90 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. Pa. 1950)
  6. Hudson County National Bank v. Simpson68 A.2d 542 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list