TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lief v. Lief

Dora Lief, Also Known as Dora Leif, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Adolph Lief, Sometimes Known as Adolph Leif, Alex Lief or Alex Leif, Defendant-Respondent

Lief v. Lief, 176 A. 318 (N.J. 1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 10, 1935
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
176 A. 318117 N.J. Eq. 4831935 N.J. LEXIS 675

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The appellant and respondent were married on May 25th, 1914, and lived together until December 15th, 1931, with the exception of an eighteen-month period, immediately after the marriage, when the appellant was in Europe.

On August 5th, 1932, the appellant filed her petition for a divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. To this the respondent filed an answer, denying any acts of cruelty, and *484 also filed a counter-claim alleging adultery on the part of the wife, which he abandoned at the trial.

The cause came on for final hearing, resulting in a decree dismissing the petition of the wife, on the ground that the charge of extreme cruelty was not brought by the petitioner in good faith, and that she had failed to establish her cause of action. Prom this decree the wife appeals.

We conclude that the evidence justified the finding of the advisory master who heard the cause and advised the decree, and we do not think it should be disturbed.

The decree below is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Pbrskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 119682026peak 1968 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wilson v. Wilson240 A.2d 188 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)

Most recent

  1. Wilson v. Wilson240 A.2d 188 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list