Vander May v. Schoone-Jongen
Garet Vander May Et Al., &C., Complainants-Respondents, v. Herman Schoone-Jongen Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
Vander May v. Schoone-Jongen, 21 A.2d 819 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1941)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The order under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Kays.
For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Raeeertt, Hague, JJ. 10.
For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Donges, Dear, Thompson, JJ. 4. ..
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.