TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vander May v. Schoone-Jongen

Garet Vander May Et Al., &C., Complainants-Respondents, v. Herman Schoone-Jongen Et Al., Defendants-Appellants

Vander May v. Schoone-Jongen, 21 A.2d 819 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 19, 1941
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
21 A.2d 819130 N.J. Eq. 2271941 N.J. LEXIS 593

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The order under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Kays.

For affirmance — Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Wells, Raeeertt, Hague, JJ. 10.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Donges, Dear, Thompson, JJ. 4. ..

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 11947: 11953: 11955: 11959: 11977: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ferroline Corp. v. General AniLine & Film Corp.207 F.2d 912 (7th Cir. 1953)
  2. Maryland Trust Co. v. Tulip Realty Co. of Maryland, Inc.153 A.2d 275 (Md. 1959)
  3. Silbros, Inc. v. Solomon52 A.2d 534 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1947)
  4. Abalene Exterminating Co. of N.J., Inc. v. Elges43 A.2d 165 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)
  5. General Electric Co. v. Automobile Ass'n of NJ117 A.2d 673 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
  6. Hogan v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.376 A.2d 1277 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1977)

Most recent

  1. Hogan v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.376 A.2d 1277 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1977)
  2. Maryland Trust Co. v. Tulip Realty Co. of Maryland, Inc.153 A.2d 275 (Md. 1959)
  3. General Electric Co. v. Automobile Ass'n of NJ117 A.2d 673 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)
  4. Ferroline Corp. v. General AniLine & Film Corp.207 F.2d 912 (7th Cir. 1953)
  5. Silbros, Inc. v. Solomon52 A.2d 534 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1947)
  6. Abalene Exterminating Co. of N.J., Inc. v. Elges43 A.2d 165 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list