Rutgers v. Martin
Nicholas G. Rutgers Et Al., Sub. Admrs., Etc., Appellants, v. J. H. Thayer Martin, State Tax Commissioner, Respondent
Rutgers v. Martin, 23 A.2d 406 (N.J. 1942)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Bodine, Pbrskie, P-orter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.