TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ryder v. Myers

Adrian H. Ryder, Executor, &C., Respondent, v. Gladys Blumenthal Myers Et Al., Appellants

Ryder v. Myers, 169 A. 691 (N.J. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 5, 1934
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
169 A. 691115 N.J. Eq. 1691934 N.J. LEXIS 742
Cited by 7

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Yice-Chaneellor Sooy, and reported in 118 N. J. Eq. 860.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 7 cases

View all citing references →
1938: 11943: 11945: 11950: 11952: 21957: 119382026peak 1952 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. NY, Etc., Animals92 A.2d 820 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  2. Henney v. Ertl71 A.2d 546 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  3. First-Mech. Nat. Bank v. First-Mech. Nat. Bank43 A.2d 674 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)
  4. Bankers Trust Co. v. NY, ETC., FOR ANIMALS86 A.2d 138 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  5. In re Pleasonton131 A.2d 795 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  6. First-Mechanics National Bank v. Norris34 A.2d 746 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1943)

Most recent

  1. In re Pleasonton131 A.2d 795 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1957)
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. NY, Etc., Animals92 A.2d 820 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  3. Bankers Trust Co. v. NY, ETC., FOR ANIMALS86 A.2d 138 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
  4. Henney v. Ertl71 A.2d 546 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  5. First-Mech. Nat. Bank v. First-Mech. Nat. Bank43 A.2d 674 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1945)
  6. First-Mechanics National Bank v. Norris34 A.2d 746 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1943)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list