TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Urback

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Sadie Urback, Respondent

Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Urback, 46 A.2d 905 (N.J. 1946)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 5, 1946
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
46 A.2d 905138 N.J. Eq. 108
Disposition
“Let the bill be dismissed.”

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

*111 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, filed in the Court of Chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Bodine, Heiier, Perskie, Oliphant, Dill, McGeehan, JJ. 7.

For reversal — Parker, Donges, Wells, Rafferty, JJ. 4.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1947: 11949: 11950: 11952: 11953: 219472026peak 1953 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.164 F.2d 660 (3d Cir. 1947)
  2. The COLONIAL LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA v. Mazur96 A.2d 95 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
  3. Glasser v. Essaness Theatres Corp.104 N.E.2d 510 (Ill. App. Ct. 1952)
  4. Bogda v. Chevrolet-Bloomfield Div., GM Corp.73 A.2d 735 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  5. Glasser v. Essaness Theatres Corp.111 N.E.2d 124 (Ill. 1953)
  6. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Sinett64 A.2d 639 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)

Most recent

  1. The COLONIAL LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA v. Mazur96 A.2d 95 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1953)
  2. Glasser v. Essaness Theatres Corp.111 N.E.2d 124 (Ill. 1953)
  3. Glasser v. Essaness Theatres Corp.104 N.E.2d 510 (Ill. App. Ct. 1952)
  4. Bogda v. Chevrolet-Bloomfield Div., GM Corp.73 A.2d 735 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Sinett64 A.2d 639 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1949)
  6. Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.164 F.2d 660 (3d Cir. 1947)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list