Bullock v. Jeffries
Elery L. (Sometimes Known as Edward L.) Bullock, Prosecutor-Appellant, v. Earl Jeffries Et Al., Commissioners of the City of Margate City, Et Al., Defendants-Respondents
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the Supreme Court dismissing the writ of certiorari must be affirmed. The opinion of that court, 117 N. J. L.
595, shows that it based its judgment on two grounds; laches and illegal creation of the position which the appellant claims the right to hold and occupy.
We base our conclusion that the judgment under review must be affirmed solely on the latter ground and not upon the grounds of laches.
*28 The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Deae, WolesKeil, Raeeeety, Cole, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Peeskie, J. 1.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.