TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

C. F. Mueller Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals

C. F. Mueller Company, Prosecutor, v. the State Board of Tax Appeals and the Borough of Maywood, Respondents

C. F. Mueller Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Appeals, 18 A.2d 564 (N.J. 1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 3, 1941
Judges
Bodine
Citations
18 A.2d 564126 N.J.L. 1411941 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 220

Opinion of the Court — Bodine

Bodine, J.

(At chambers.)

Certiorari was allowed to review a tax assessment of $16,980 for the year 1939, upon prosecutor’s lands in the borough of Maywood. The evidence examined discloses that the true value of the property is $4,800. It, therefore, becomes our duty to reduce the assessment to that amount.

Lawrence Township v. State Board, &c., 124 N.

J. L.

465;

Tennant v. Jersey City, 122 Id.

174;

Gannon v. State Board, 123 Id.

450.

The proofs disclose that the land in question, slightly less than nine acres, is composed of a number of lots not all contiguous. Streets were laid out on paper, some of which are dead enders. Sewers were laid, at prosecutor’s expense, but the manholes will have to be rebuilt to grade. The land is overgrown with underbrush. No pavements have been laid, nor has the land been graded. The property may become town lots some day, if and when great sums of money are expended in order to remove it from the sphere of wild lands. Assessments must be based upon facts and not on hopes. The borough acquired other lands in the neighborhood at a cost of $530 an acre. The land was converted into a playground.

Prosecutor has offered to sell the property for $5,000. It *142 can find no purchaser at any price. The time may come when a wilderness blossoms into a town with streets, sidewalks and graded lots covered with neat houses. Till that day comes, the wilderness lots have no greater value than any untillable acreage.

The assessment will be reduced as suggested.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list