TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morgan v. Susino Construction Co.

James Francis Morgan, by His Next Friend and Mother, Bessie Hickstein Morgan, Respondent-Respondent v. Susino Construction Company, Prosecutor-Appellant.

Morgan v. Susino Constr. Co., 36 A.2d 604 (N.J. 1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 23, 1944
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
36 A.2d 604131 N.J.L. 3291944 N.J. LEXIS 203

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for tlie reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court; reserving, however, any expression as to the rights of an unborn child not within the *330 statutory provision. See Stemmer v. Kline, 128 N. J. L.

455.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 10.

For reversal — Heiier, Wells, Raeeerty, JJ. 3.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1951: 11956: 11965: 11971: 11982: 11988: 119512026peak 1951 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Giardina v. Bennett545 A.2d 139 (N.J. 1988)
  2. BARR'S NEXT OF KIN v. Cherokee, Inc.68 S.E.2d 440 (S.C. 1951)
  3. S. L. W. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board490 P.2d 42 (Alaska 1971)
  4. Ashman v. Madigan122 A.2d 382 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)
  5. Kolakowski v. Thomas Mfg. Corp.212 A.2d 786 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1965)
  6. Smith v. Givens290 S.E.2d 844 (Va. 1982)

Most recent

  1. Giardina v. Bennett545 A.2d 139 (N.J. 1988)
  2. Smith v. Givens290 S.E.2d 844 (Va. 1982)
  3. S. L. W. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board490 P.2d 42 (Alaska 1971)
  4. Kolakowski v. Thomas Mfg. Corp.212 A.2d 786 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1965)
  5. Ashman v. Madigan122 A.2d 382 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)
  6. BARR'S NEXT OF KIN v. Cherokee, Inc.68 S.E.2d 440 (S.C. 1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list