Morgan v. Susino Construction Co.
James Francis Morgan, by His Next Friend and Mother, Bessie Hickstein Morgan, Respondent-Respondent v. Susino Construction Company, Prosecutor-Appellant.
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for tlie reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court; reserving, however, any expression as to the rights of an unborn child not within the *330 statutory provision. See Stemmer v. Kline, 128 N. J. L.
455.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Dear, Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Heiier, Wells, Raeeerty, JJ. 3.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.